The Home of Fantasy Sports Analysis

Top 75 Starting Pitchers for NL-Only Leagues (Updated!)

Okay, I’m feeling better. My AL-Only Starting Pitcher Rankings had me a bit down. Yeah, the top six or seven are nice, but it thins out real quick and there’s not a lot of intrigue in the later rounds, except for a couple of top prospects returning from Tommy John. While the National League can’t quite match the top tier of the American League, I think there’s more depth and it’s also home to some of my favorite starting pitching sleepers for 2019. Let’s dig into my NL-Only Starting Pitcher Rankings so you can see what I mean.

If you’re like us, you can’t wait until spring to get the 2019 fantasy baseball season started. Well, you don’t have to. Leagues are already forming at, so head on over and get your league started today.

Pitching Strategy in 2019 NL-Only Leagues

I mentioned it in my AL SP rankings and I’ll say it again. It’s time to re-imagine how you view pitchers. This applies in a typical 12-team mixed league and it’s even more extreme in AL- and NL-Only leagues. When it comes to starting pitching, you have to turn to quality over quantity. What I mean by this is I would rather have three or four starting pitchers from the top two tiers than six or seven from throughout the draft. Why you might ask? Go ahead, ask.

I’ll tell you why (you knew I would). It’s because the gap between the lower-middle class of starting pitchers and a growing group of top middle relievers is narrowing. These starting pitchers are throwing fewer innings and bullpens are soaking up the excess. This isn’t really affecting the top tier or two of starting pitchers, so they’re more valuable than ever. It does, however, mean more wins and strikeouts from middle relievers than ever before.

So the basic take here is to grab at least two top-20 starting pitchers and forgo the innings eater types (think Tanner Roark) in favor of high-strikeout low-WHIP relievers. The innings eaters aren’t eating as much and they will likely leave you with an upset stomach (and WHIP).

Starting Pitchers to Target

I usually have a nice list of lower-ranked starting pitchers I like as sleepers. It’s not as easy in the current pitching atmosphere, but here are a few names down the list I might entertain if things roll right.

As you can see, I like Brandon Woodruff. I’ve got him at No. 22 which is probably higher than most anywhere you’ll see. He got jerked around a bit in 2018, both between the majors and minors and from starting to relieving. We’re working on small sample sizes here, but Woodruff really seemed to figure things out as the season progressed, putting up a 2.25 ERA and 11.81 K/9 in the second half. That was all from the bullpen, though he did go four innings in one appearance. He continued that into the postseason with 12.1 innings of 1.46 ERA and 14.59 K/9 dominance. Can he come close to that level as a starter? It’s hard to say. At worst you draft a high-inning middle reliever in the mold of Brewer teammate Josh Hader.

Julio Urias is another pitcher I’ll be tracking this spring. Much of the prospect hype has died down thanks to anterior capsule surgery in 2017. Yeah, I’m touting a pitcher who threw more innings in the 2018 postseason than he did the regular season. Right now the Dodgers are looking at him as a starting pitcher, but with innings limitations… Aren’t nearly all starting pitchers in the same boat? Anyway, Urias definitely has the talent and he’ll be pitching for a good team in a pitcher-friendly ballpark. If I’m looking for value, the scene is definitely set.

Both these young pitchers epitomize my philosophy on pitching. They may not pitch a lot of innings or have a shot at 15-plus wins, but what innings they do throw are very likely to be very good. Quality over Quantity!

A Caveat on these Rankings

What, there’s a caveat? Isn’t there always? Don’t worry, it’s nothing earth-shattering. As you peruse these NL-Only Starting Pitcher Rankings, also check out the innings pitched projections. As I tweak the rankings, I’m always amazed at how a couple wins or 15 strikeouts can affect things. I’ll be updating these rankings all spring. Just realize that the values of all these pitchers are health and role dependent.

Woodruff and Urias are perfect examples. Right now they are being viewed as starters. If that changes, our rankings have to follow. Yu Darvish is way down at No. 40. Any good word on his health vaults him way up these rankings. Alex Reyes is the same. So as you are nitpicking (we all do it) my rankings, realize a few extra outings can mean a lot. If you think Kershaw makes 32 starts, by all means, put him at the top. It’s your team.

NL-Only Rankings: | C | 1B | 2B | 3B | SS | OF | SP | RP |

2019 NL-Only Starting Pitcher Rankings

[table “346” not found /]

Enjoying these 2019 NL-Only Starting Pitcher Rankings? For more great rankings, strategy, and analysis check out the 2019 FantraxHQ Fantasy Baseball Draft Kit. We’ll be adding more content from now right up until Opening Day!

Doug Anderson is an 11-year veteran of the Fantasy Sports industry. His work has appeared on,,, and, as well as in the pages of USA Today’s Fantasy Baseball Weekly and various other magazines. Doug has participated in both LABR and Tout Wars, the two preeminent expert fantasy baseball leagues in existence. Doug was formerly the Executive Editor at RotoExperts and is now Managing Editor here at FantraxHQ. You can follow him on Twitter @RotoDaddy.

Fantrax is one of the fastest growing fantasy sites of 2018. With multi-team trades, designated commissioner/league managers, and drag/drop easy click methods, Fantrax is sure to excite the serious fantasy sports fan – sign up now for a free year at

  1. tog says

    I will take John Gant or Ross Stripling before 20 of those guys on your list.

    1. Doug Anderson says

      I’ll adjust as Spring Training progresses, but Gant had a SIERA of 4.88 last year, has little strikeout upside and is not a sure thing for a rotation slot. I do tend to rank lower level starting pitchers without upside lower than most. IMO Gant has a very real chance to produce negative value. I am admittedly lower than Stripling than most. He was pretty bad down the stretch last year and will not be in the rotation to start the season. With that said, I’ve tweaked his projections a bit since this article published and he’ll go up a bit when I update shortly. Still not all that high on him. If you like these guys, then draft them. That’s why fantasy baseball is so fun. We can disagree and prove it on the field.

  2. Rob says

    You have 126 innings projected for Jimmy Nelson. How much changes if he’s around 160 or 170? Is that doable with his health, the team and their bullpen? Could he jump from 56 to 26 in the rankings? Struggling on how to value him in a keeper league with an eye on this season.

    1. Doug Anderson says

      Could he jump that high? For sure, but I’d have to hear lots of good things about him in Spring Training. In fact, though my current projections have him valued on the low end, if there’s positive news at all, I’d rather have him than a known mediocrity. Definitely a pitcher I’ll be watching closely.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.